KNETMAPTM Identifies
Key People and Expertise in Manufacturing Organization The challenge: appoint
twelve "Knowledge Stewards" in an organization of two hundred knowledge workers
in three global locations. The project team used the organizational survey tool KNETMAPTM
to identify peer-evaluated experts in four functional domains. The reaction from the
Project Team after seeing the results from InFlowTM: "The ten
"hubs" for each category identified additional individuals that we had
originally overlooked for the new positions."
"The KNETMAPTM results greatly expanded our horizon of visibility. Our
initial choices were limited to our own relatively closed network."
Result: the project team modified their original short list of twelve and expanded the
list to include the newly identified KNETMAPTM "hubs" and
"authorities".
A 60-year global manufacturer of fluid engineered products with 450 employees based in
Canada, the US and the UK undertook to implement a sophisticated document management
system in the year 2001. The system was envisioned to serve as both a document repository
and knowledge management system.
After company-wide training on the system was completed, it became obvious that a new
role for champions had to be created within the organization, namely that of knowledge
steward, the "agent of value creation". Knowledge stewards were described as
"lifelong learners who have the ability to communicate well with colleagues and
promote the ideas of peers and subordinates with attribution". A knowledge steward
would, in short, champion knowledge-sharing culture and the creation and reuse of
knowledge artifacts. The project team made a short list of candidates, but took up the
suggestion of one of the team members that the formal choices be confirmed by the new
organizational network surveying instrument called KNETMAPTM.
KNETMAPTM gathers data through a single question delivered weekly via the
corporate email system to all employees. The information gathering process is simple and
takes less than a minute to complete. The recipient answers the question by clicking on a
hyperlink embedded in the email, which leads to a web page that allows them to quickly
answer the question by selecting names. The project team decided to trial KNETMAPTM
to confirm its knowledge steward choices in four key categories: order fulfillment,
product development (innovation); supplier relationships, and knowledge artifacts. It was
expected that results would confirm the original choices and might even identify key
individuals ("hubs") who may have been overlooked in the initial discussions.
The following four questions were posed in December 2001 to 250 employees:
1) From whom would you seek advice or with whom would you brainstorm
regarding opportunities to improve our relationships with our suppliers. Please select two
or three people you might personally approach.
(Supplier network)
2) From whom would you seek advice or with whom would you brainstorm
regarding improvements to the order fulfillment process. Please select two or three people
you might personally approach.
(Order fulfillment network)
3) From whom would you seek advice or with whom would you brainstorm
regarding a new innovation or an idea of yours for product development. Please select two
or three people you might personally approach.
(Innovation network)
4) To whom would you go for advice on where to file your documents,
drawings, etc. so that others could easily find them (without having to ask you).
(Knowledge Artifact network)
The results confirmed the implementation teams initial choices and yielded some
surprises, as some prominent "hubs" became evident. Other revelations included
disconnected clusters and isolated employees.
When the node data was imported into InFlowTM, the project team received a
list of the "top ten" hubs for each network with the corresponding InFlowTM
metric for "Reach".
Reaction from Participants
Quote from one of the organization's IT suppliers, who participated in the survey:
"It is very interesting to know if we are talking to the right people when
implementing a solution. So much of what we do is trying to unleash the best ideas. When I
saw at an early stage names I have never recognized in the innovation network, I
suddenly wondered if we were talking to the right people. We could use this information to
identify key resources in the design phase in a lot of our projects. I'm sure its
something almost all companies should use."
"These invisible networks, finally made visible through the maps generated by
Question of the WeekTM, showed us how individuals contribute directly to the conductivity
of our organization," said the CEO. "Conductivity has a special meaning for me
as an engineer. It means to conduct, to lead'" it also means to convey and
transmit... and to serve as a channel. Conduction is also about the transmission of energy
from particle to particle. This is very much in line with what a conductive organizational
network should be."
Next steps
Approach the KNETMAPTM identified subject matter experts and invite them to
populate the system with knowledge artifacts so that a KNETMAPTM view of
knowledge artifacts can be used as a business indicator. Knowledge artifacts can be
tracked for reuse via the KNETMAPTM system.
The long-term benefits that the firm hopes to see are improved knowledge assets reuse
-- a corporate strategic imperative. Such a move will contribute positively towards the
firms efforts to mitigate knowledge loss.
KNETMAPTM Identifies key stakeholders (internal & external) in innovation i.e. "Leaders of Innovation", thereby unleashing existing capability and creativity in the development of new competitive products for the
financial services industry
The challenge: leverage employee and supplier knowledge of
customer and market trends to create highly profitable products that address customer
needs and transform the organization into a market leader
Background:
Companies must bring new and profitable services and products
to the market more quickly than their competitors
in order to survive in the global marketplace. Unfortunately,
customer expectations of quality, service and response
time have risen exponentially while organization
capability increases linearly. Many companies attempt
to bridge this gap by increasing capacity through
acquisition- often at the expense of shareholder
value. The alternative is to be an industry leader
by powerfully leveraging employee and supplier knowledge
of customer and market trends.
When managed as a strategic capability, corporate knowledge has
proven to improve productivity, organizational effectiveness and innovative capacity. All
managers in an organization should care about corporate knowledge and embrace a leadership
role in its management. All employees in an organization should be cognizant of their role
in contributing to corporate knowledge and value creation.
The Opportunity
Traditional approaches to innovation through data-mining are time
consuming and yield lag indicators at best. The client chose a Knowledge Management
approach to innovation which had the advantage of:
- Speed
- Accessing tacit as well as explicit knowledge within the
organization
- Identifying & creating emerging demand rather than
extrapolating from historical demand
- Engaging key stakeholders (internal & external) in innovation
The leveraging of tacit knowledge
the undocumented knowledge
gained through experience and relationships
was a particular strength of a Knowledge
Management approach to innovation. Employees and suppliers engaged in an opportunity to
exploit this knowledge brought an energy and commitment to producing results that is
seldom evident in traditional innovation strategies.
A Knowledge Management Approach
A knowledge management approach enhanced the enterprise's ability
to bring new and profitable services and products to the market more quickly than its
competitors.
Internal Leadership
Outcome: Identification of influence and best practice leaders
within the enterprise
- Training of the enterprise's CIO and IT managers in use of KNETMAPTM
and the design of key questions
- Analysis of KNETMAPTM results
- Selection of the Leaders of Innovation Project
Team and Team Leader
Project Launch
Outcome: Leaders
of Innovation project charter, success criteria,
schedule, budget and workplan
- The vision, mission and goal of the initiative
- Success criteria
- Scope
- Key Deliverables
- Workplan
- Budget & Schedule
- Reporting Relationships
- Communications Plan
- Quality Assurance Program
The project team used on-line project tools to track project
success.
Quality Assurance Checkpoint
Outcome: Quality Assurance Report on budget, schedule and
quality variances, as well as team and stakeholder satisfaction- two months following the
project launch.
- Project metrics
- Team and stakeholder satisfaction
- Sponsor performance
- Team leadership
Project Close-Out
Outcome: Debriefing of project lessons and creation of an
action plan for continuous improvement.
- Project performance
- Lessons learned re: project, change and knowledge management
- Leader performance
- Opportunities for continuous improvement
- Next steps
Return on Investment
The Enterprise's return on investment was both qualitative and
quantitative.
Qualitative
The Enterprise received the following qualitative results:
- Experience in the implementation of a successful change initiative
- Increased capability in the best practices of project management
and change management
- Identification and recognition of internal influence & best
practice leaders
- Skill and experience with using KNETMAPTM to identify
leaders and knowledge within the company
Quantitative
The Enterprise received the following quantitative results:
-
Increased profits through the successful delivery of a new business
service